Benchmark Mobile AI Reconnect Recovery Across Lifecycle Transitions With a Server You Can Kill A developer built a killable relay server to benchmark mobile AI reconnect behavior across lifecycle transitions, addressing silent failures like lost conversation turns when apps are suspended mid-stream. The harness injects faults such as upstream delays and mid-stream socket drops, making reconnect behavior a measurable property. The setup uses a Node 20 relay that proxies to an OpenAI-compatible endpoint and applies per-request fault profiles via headers, with a test matrix covering scenarios like backgrounding and returning. Last week I was testing an AI chat feature on my iPhone 14 iOS 17.5, React Native 0.74, Hermes . The flow looked fine on Wi-Fi. Then I walked into an elevator mid-stream, the radio dropped, iOS suspended the app, and when I came back the conversation had silently lost the last two turns. No error. No retry. Just a gap in the transcript that only the user would notice. The problem with testing this class of bug is that I don't control the model backend. I can't tell a hosted LLM API to hang for 40 seconds, drop a socket mid-response, or return a truncated chunk — and those are exactly the conditions my app fails under. So I started routing the app through a relay server I can kill, and suddenly reconnect behavior became a benchmarkable property instead of a vibe. This post is the harness, the test matrix, and how I run it. Everything below is a reproducible setup, not a finished benchmark report — where I expect a result rather than having measured one, I say so. Point your mobile app at a thin relay in front of the real model API. The relay proxies requests but lets you inject: If your AI task survives a relay that is deliberately hostile , it has a chance of surviving real networks. Disclosure: This article was prepared as part of MonkeyCode's product outreach. The reason it fits here is practical: MonkeyCode offers free model access and a free server option, which means the relay plus a model backend can run without me paying for a VPS or burning API budget during long fault-injection sessions. Any equivalent free tier works for this harness — the point is that cost stops being an excuse to skip the test, not that one provider is uniquely fast or reliable I have not benchmarked MonkeyCode's latency and make no claim about it . Minimal Node 20 relay. It streams from an upstream OpenAI-compatible endpoint and applies a per-request fault profile from headers, so the test runner — not the app — controls the chaos: python // relay.mjs — run: node relay.mjs import http from 'node:http'; const UPSTREAM = process.env.UPSTREAM URL; // your model endpoint const KEY = process.env.UPSTREAM KEY; http.createServer async req, res = { if req.method == 'POST' { res.writeHead 404 ; return res.end ; } const delay = parseInt req.headers 'x-fault-delay' || '0', 10 ; const dropAfterBytes = parseInt req.headers 'x-fault-drop' || '0', 10 ; let body = ''; for await const c of req body += c; if delay await new Promise r = setTimeout r, delay ; const up = await fetch UPSTREAM, { method: 'POST', headers: { 'content-type': 'application/json', authorization: Bearer ${KEY} }, body, } ; res.writeHead up.status, { 'content-type': up.headers.get 'content-type' ?? 'application/json' } ; const reader = up.body.getReader ; let sent = 0; while true { const { done, value } = await reader.read ; if done break; sent += value.length; if dropAfterBytes && sent dropAfterBytes { res.socket.destroy ; // simulate a radio drop mid-stream return; } res.write value ; } res.end ; } .listen 8787, = console.log 'relay on :8787' ; Point the app's base URL at http://