Beijing hits back at Anthropic CEO’s call to curb China's AI development China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Monday rejected Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's call for the U.S. to curb China's AI capabilities, with spokesperson Guo Jiakun saying that "fearmongering, confrontation and vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance which serves no one's interest." Amodei's Saturday essay warned that a "Chinese lead in AI would pose grave danger for the United States and the world" and urged continued restrictions on sales of cutting-edge AI chips and chipmaking equipment to China, while predicting a swarm of AI agents could take over the internet in six to 12 months absent researcher agreement to slow down. U.S. President Donald Trump downplayed calls to slow AI development on Sunday, saying the U.S. leads China on AI and that "whoever wins AI, wins," ahead of a planned Sept. 24 meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping where AI governance is expected to be discussed. BEIJING AP — China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Monday hit back at a call from the head of Anthropic for the U.S. to curb China's artificial intelligence https://apnews.com/hub/artificial-intelligence capabilities, which he issued as he argued for a global slowdown on AI development. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping are expected to discuss AI governance, among other topics, at a meeting planned on Sept. 24. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei in a lengthy essay published on Saturday warned that a "Chinese lead in AI would pose grave danger for the United States and the world." He called for continuing restrictions on sales of cutting-edge AI chips and chipmaking equipment to China in order to keep the U.S.'s AI edge. China's https://apnews.com/hub/china Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded to a question about Amodei's essay by saying that all parties should work together on AI. "Fearmongering, confrontation and vicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance which serves no one's interest," spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a regular press conference on Monday. On Sunday, President Donald Trump https://apnews.com/hub/donald-trump downplayed calls for his administration to step in to slow down AI development, saying that the U.S. was leading China https://apnews.com/article/trump-artificial-intelligence-guardrails-china-midterms-congress-9df0ebb4c1b0619aa0f88057b5a1092d on AI and that "whoever wins AI, wins." Amodei also predicted that a swarm of AI "agents" could be able to take over the internet https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-threats-humanity-anthropic-openai-98316b0d64de17191f33c0fbf1d37858 in six to 12 months unless researchers agree to slow down. He said that "global pacing will require cooperation with China, the autocratic country with by far the most advanced AI capabilities." Trump and Xi could discuss AI governance at summit U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to discuss topics including AI governance with Chinese leader Xi Jinping meeting planned https://apnews.com/article/china-us-wang-yi-trump-xi-meeting-735838b80c7d4169936f1ba47f889546 for late September. Chinese companies have developed powerful AI models that are often cheaper to use than advanced models from U.S.-based companies, even as by some measures, they are just as capable. China's Xi has called for https://apnews.com/article/china-ai-tech-chips-xi-us-df4cfc7e1b260e765b5449b6d71a48e5 the setting up of a global AI governance framework among Global South, while pitching China as a pioneer in establishing an open-source AI community. The head of China's Ministry of State Security has also called for "accelerating the establishment of a system for preventing and managing AI security risks" in a recent article. Beijing accuses US of trying to hold it back In an editorial published Sunday, China's state-run Global Times newspaper dismissed Amodei's essay as a veiled call to "contain" China. It said that Amodei's essay may appear on the surface to be focused on global AI security, but, that it is "packed with containment provisions targeting China and is, in essence, a 'Cold War playbook' for the AI sector."