Before you leave Claude Managed Agents, check these five things

An engineer at Gobare published a five-point checklist for teams evaluating whether to leave Anthropic's Claude Managed Agents, citing Anthropic documentation that the hosted harness supports only Claude 4.5 and later models, drops webhook events after three failed delivery attempts with no signal, offers no documented interactive shell into its managed sandbox, and is not eligible for Zero Data Retention or HIPAA BAA coverage. The author, who discloses working on the competing hosted runtime Gobare, notes that self-hosting open-source alternatives such as OpenMA and open-managed-agents is the only route that resolves all five issues, while Gobare addresses checks 1, 3 and 4.

If you build only on Claude, Claude Managed Agents is the hosted harness to use. Here are the five cases where you need something else, checked against Anthropic's docs. Disclosure: I work on Gobare, one of the alternatives below. I've quoted Anthropic's documentation rather than paraphrasing it, and there's a section on where we're weaker. Claude Managed Agents gives you a lot that is hard to build yourself: running ." If none of the checks below applies to you, stop reading and stay. Anthropic describes the product as the harness "for running Claude as an autonomous agent", and the setup guide says "Claude 4.5 and later models are supported." If your evals pick DeepSeek for bulk turns, a customer mandates a provider, or you route by cost, the harness can't run it. This is the most common reason people search for an alternative, and the simplest to test: list the models your product needs in a year. You configure the system prompt, tools, MCP servers and skills. How tool calls are dispatched, how errors are recovered and how context is compacted runs on Anthropic's side. Most teams never need to see that code. If you've ever had to step through a harness to understand why an agent looped, you'll know whether you're one of the teams that does. This one surprised me. Anthropic's webhook docs say: "Anthropic makes up to three delivery attempts", and after the last one "the event is dropped: it isn't queued for later delivery and there's no signal that it was lost." They also recommend reconciling by listing or fetching the resource through the API. That's a reasonable design, and it's documented honestly. It does mean that if a webhook triggers billing, a database write or a user notification, you need a polling reconciler next to it. Check whether you've built one. When a long agent run gets stuck on a broken native dependency or a hung background process, the event stream often isn't enough. I didn't find a documented way to get an interactive shell into an Anthropic-managed cloud sandbox. With a self-hosted sandbox the machine is yours, so you can get in, but then you run the compute. Anthropic is direct: "Managed Agents is not currently eligible for Zero Data Retention or HIPAA Business Associate Agreement BAA coverage", because sessions store their history, sandbox state and outputs. No hosted alternative I know of fixes this, including ours. If ZDR is a hard requirement, self-host. | | Who runs it | Models | Fixes | |---|---|---|---| | Stay on Claude Managed Agents | Anthropic | Claude 4.5+ | None of the five, but it's the best at everything else | | Self-host open source OpenMA, open-managed-agents, AstraBox | You | Any | Any of the five, because the code, the machines and the data are yours; you run the platform | | Hosted runtime with your own key Gobare | Gobare | Nine providers plus any OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoint | 1, 3 and 4; for 2 you can read the loop but not change it | For the self-hosted route, OpenMA https://github.com/openma-ai/open-managed-agents Apache-2.0 describes itself as "an open-source alternative to Claude Managed Agents and OpenAI Agents API" and also offers a hosted version. open-managed-agents https://github.com/rogeriochaves/open-managed-agents AGPL-3.0 adds org, team and RBAC governance. On the hosted route, what Gobare does for checks 1 to 4: you connect a key from any supported provider and it never enters the sandbox. The harness is pi https://github.com/earendil-works/pi , which is open source and runs unmodified. Webhooks are retried six times over roughly nine hours, with dead-letter tracking. An engineer can ssh -p 2222 s-$SESSION@ssh.gobare.dev into the session's machine, after registering a key in the Console. Before you switch to us, know what you give up: .git , no node modules , skipped above 300 MB, and running processes aren't kept. Run the five checks. If none applies, stay on Claude Managed Agents. If check 5 applies, self-host. If only checks 1, 3 or 4 apply and you'd rather not run a platform, a hosted runtime on your own key is the middle route. The full comparison, with a concept map from Managed Agents primitives to another runtime and side-by-side requests, is on gobare.dev https://gobare.dev/blog/claude-managed-agents-alternative . Which of the five made you look for an alternative, or is there a sixth I've missed?