Austin's City Council voted unanimously to start banning the biggest AI data centers within city limits, with binding rules due by the end of 2026.
Nine votes. Zero no's. That's how Austin's council moved on Thursday, sending city staff off to draft land-use rules that could outlaw hyperscale data centers inside the city and tighten water, power, noise and lighting requirements for the smaller ones that remain. The resolution, known as Item 61, doesn't ban anything yet. Texas law won't let a city do that overnight. But it starts the zoning process that could, and it comes with a hard deadline: binding regulations by December 31, 2026.
Council member José Velásquez put the intent plainly, telling the Austin Chronicle, "We cannot and we will not support the presence of hyperscale data centers within the city." That's not a hedge. Council member Zohaib Qadri, who pushed the amendment requiring council notification on the biggest projects, said the rapid growth of hyperscale data centers poses serious challenges for the city's energy and water resources, according to reporting from Community Impact.
The numbers explain the alarm. Austin currently has around ten data centers, each drawing somewhere between 1 and 20 megawatts, Community Impact reported. A hyperscale facility elsewhere in Texas routinely pulls more than 100 megawatts, some past 300. Under the amended resolution, any project requesting more than 20 megawatts of power or more than 85 million gallons of water a year now has to come before the full council instead of getting cleared by planning staff alone.
Austin isn't some town discovering data centers for the first time. It's Silicon Hills. Tesla runs its Gigafactory just east of downtown. Oracle moved its headquarters here. Apple has a campus north of the city, and Dell, Samsung, Amazon and Google all have a real footprint in the metro. The city spent two decades recruiting exactly this kind of investment.
A Russian Ransomware Gang Says It Broke Into the ATF's Investigation Files The ATF confirmed a "major incident" on August 26 after the Russia-linked Qilin ransomware gang listed the agency on its dark web leak site. The compromised system reportedly held information on active federal firearms investigation targets, not gun-owner records, and Qilin has yet to post proof of what it stole. - Russian ransomware gang breaches ATF investigation files - Qilin ransomware attack on federal law enforcement agency
Now the same council that courted that growth is drawing a line at its newest form. That's what makes this vote worth watching beyond city limits. If the place that built its economy on being cheap and welcoming to tech companies is the one voting to keep hyperscale data centers out, other cities riding the AI buildout have cover to ask the questions Austin residents have been asking for months, about water supplies during drought years and electricity bills climbing as the grid absorbs new industrial load.
According to the Texas Tribune, the push follows real resident frustration that data centers were on track to lock in decades of water and power demand before the city had any say at all. Austin doesn't yet have a hyperscale project sited inside its limits. That timing is deliberate. It's a lot easier to write a ban before a multibillion-dollar facility breaks ground than after.
The state is cracking down too, just with a different tool #
Governor Greg Abbott isn't exactly cheering the industry on either. In early August, he directed the Public Utility Commission of Texas and ERCOT to run a full audit of every data center connecting to the state grid, a move that the Texas Tribune and Houston Public Media both reported effectively freezes new project approvals until the review is done. Abbott also pushed state lawmakers to consider stripping the industry's sales tax exemptions when the legislature reconvenes in January.
So Texas now has two governments squeezing the same industry from two different angles. The state is auditing grid connections and eyeing tax breaks. The city is trying to zone the largest facilities out entirely. They rarely agree on land use, but for once Austin and the state capitol sit on the same side of a fight, even if neither wants credit for helping the other.
None of this stops AI infrastructure spending elsewhere in Texas, where cheap power and light regulation have pulled in hundreds of projects, including a $440 million facility already under construction in nearby Bastrop County. What it does is give hyperscalers one more line item to weigh before they pick a site: whether the city they're eyeing is still willing to have them.
Austin's binding rules aren't written yet. Staff recommendations still have to move through boards and commissions before landing back on the council's desk. But the direction is set, and the deadline is real: by the end of this year, Austin will have decided, formally, whether hyperscale AI data centers get to exist inside it at all.
Also read: France Is Pulling Microsoft Off 2.5 Million Government Computers • Rillet turned an unsolicited board update into a $1 billion accounting startup in 48 hours • Vishal Garg Offers to Work for $1 to Force His Way Back Into Better.com
Hackers Stole Data on 8.7 Million Manchester Airports Group Customers Manchester Airports Group confirmed a data breach affecting roughly 8.7 million customers across Manchester, Stansted and East Midlands airports, exposing Wi-Fi, car park, lounge and Fast Track booking data. Hackers demanded a ransom; MAG refused to pay. - hackers stole data from Manchester Airports Group - data breach at Manchester Airports Group affects millions