# arXiv limits submitters to two new papers a month amid record volume

> Source: <https://mlq.ai/news/arxiv-limits-submitters-to-two-new-papers-a-month-amid-record-volume/>
> Published: 2026-10-12 11:40:10.555329+00:00

# arXiv limits submitters to two new papers a month amid record volume

- arXiv’s two-submission monthly cap took effect October 1, 2026, across all categories. <sup>[\[1\]](https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/updated-rate-limit-policy/)</sup>
- The repository received 40,363 submissions in September, nearly double the total from September 2024; cs.AI submissions grew more than sixfold over two years. <sup>[\[1\]](https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/updated-rate-limit-policy/)</sup>
- The rule applies to the account that submits a paper. Rejected papers count toward the limit, while deleting a paper before announcement restores the slot. <sup>[\[1\]](https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/updated-rate-limit-policy/)</sup>

arXiv began limiting each submitter to two new papers per calendar month on October 1, adding a blanket quota to its existing limit of three active submissions. The temporary policy applies across every subject category and is designed to reduce the workload on arXiv’s volunteer moderators. [\[1\]](https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/updated-rate-limit-policy/)

The preprint repository said it received 40,363 submissions in September, compared with 20,569 in September 2024 and 9,869 in September 2016. September’s submissions generated almost 9,000 support tickets, while the computer-science AI category grew more than sixfold over the past two years. [\[1\]](https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/updated-rate-limit-policy/)

## A limit on submissions, not authorship

The cap follows the person who clicks submit. A co-authored paper counts against that account’s allowance, not against every co-author. Rejected submissions still use one of the two monthly slots because they have already consumed moderation time; papers deleted before announcement do not. [\[1\]](https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/updated-rate-limit-policy/)

arXiv said advanced AI tools are helping drive the rise in volume and that a relatively small group of authors is submitting large numbers of low-quality papers. The organization cited thin, narrowly scoped and densely AI-written manuscripts, but did not quantify how many authors are affected or what share of submissions used AI. [\[1\]](https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/updated-rate-limit-policy/)

The policy has drawn mixed reactions from researchers. Some scholars told Times Higher Education that a quota could encourage authors to submit only their strongest work, while others argued that arXiv should target moderation effort more precisely rather than restrict legitimate research. [\[2\]](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/academic/research/1000?page=18)

## Further sources

The stories that matter, in one email. Free — unsubscribe anytime.