cd /news/ai-research/arxiv-endorsement-request-independen… · home topics ai-research article
[ARTICLE · art-135375] src=discuss.huggingface.co ↗ pub= topic=ai-research verified=true sentiment=· neutral

arXiv endorsement request — independent researcher, AI evaluation & measurement theory (O-CRA / dispositiometrics)

Independent researcher Formian Labs is seeking a personal arXiv endorsement in the cs.AI category for a paper titled "The Organizational Cognitive Resonance & Alignment (O-CRA) Framework: A Multi-Dimensional Model for Quantifying Organizational AI Alignment," with endorsement code NMKE6G. The paper's original figures of 135 model versions from 29 developer labs across 203 boundary-focused organisational scenarios have been superseded by a revised dataset of 137 model versions from 29 labs, published as "O-CRA Paper - Final (V2.1, 2026-09)" (Rev 9), SSRN abstract 6840499, with an open dataset and interactive explorer at formianlabs.com/explorer. The framework scores AI disposition across six dimensions on a Cautious → Adaptive → Accommodating spectrum, reporting a 89.2-point spread on the Governance & Safety dimension and category-boundary crossings in six of seven tracked version pairs.

read1 min views1 publishedSep 20, 2026
arXiv endorsement request — independent researcher, AI evaluation & measurement theory (O-CRA / dispositiometrics)
Image: Discuss (auto-discovered)

Hi everyone! I’m an independent researcher preparing my first arXiv submission in the cs.AI category and need a personal endorsement from an established arXiv author in that category (or a closely related one like cs.LG).

Paper: “The Organizational Cognitive Resonance & Alignment (O-CRA) Framework: A Multi-Dimensional Model for Quantifying Organizational AI Alignment” — a framework that measures an AI system’s disposition (how it chooses to behave, not just what it can do), resolved across six dimensions onto a continuous Cautious → Adaptive → Accommodating spectrum. Empirically validated on 135 model versions from 29 developer labs across 203 boundary-focused organisational scenarios. Headline findings: disposition is a stable, measurable axis distinct from capability; Governance & Safety is the most contested dimension (89.2-point spread); and six of seven tracked version pairs crossed a category boundary between releases.

If you’ve published in cs.AI / cs.LG within the last few years and are willing to endorse, here’s the link and code. Happy to answer any questions. Endorsement Code: NMKE6G Link: Log in to arXiv | arXiv e-print repository ORCID: 0009-0007-6648-9178 Paper: O-CRA: A Framework for Organizational Cognitive Resonance and Alignment - a Hugging Face Space by Formian-Labs

Thank you!

Since posting this, the work moved on: the dataset is now 137 model versions from 29 labs, the scoring basis was unified, and every figure in the current paper recomputes from primary data by an automated audit. The numbers in this post predate that revision, so treat the current paper as the reference of record: “O-CRA Paper - Final (V2.1, 2026-09)” (Rev 9), SSRN abstract 6840499, with the open dataset and an interactive explorer at Explorer — Formian Labs. Endorsement code and link above are unchanged.

── more in #ai-research 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @arxiv 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/arxiv-endorsement-re…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-09-20 ·