[arXiv cs.LG Endorsement Request] Why Can Systems Trained on the Same Data Scale Differently?

Jie Wang of Southwest University of Political Science and Law is seeking endorsement from arXiv cs.LG moderators for a paper titled 'Coupled Scaling: A Representational Accessibility Framework for Neural Scaling Laws,' which proposes a framework to explain why systems trained on the same data can scale differently. The paper introduces a task-conditioned model where the residual exponent lies between ργ and γ, with exact lower bound α=ργ under bounded off-prefix gain, and proposes a preregistrable factorial test. The endorsement code is ZAWO79.

Hi everyone, I’m preparing my first arXiv submission in cs.LG and am seeking an endorsement. Paper: Coupled Scaling: A Representational Accessibility Framework for Neural Scaling Laws The paper asks why systems trained on the same data can exhibit different scaling behavior when architecture or optimization changes the task-relevant representations they can efficiently reach. It introduces Coupled Scaling , a task-conditioned framework connecting finite-budget neural scaling to representational accessibility. Main results: In a solvable mode-truncation model, loss separates exactly into target energy outside architectural support and an unresolved supported tail. For arbitrary acquisition orders, the residual exponent lies in ργ≤α≤γ. Under bounded off-prefix gain, the lower endpoint is exact: α=ργ. A fixed-kernel specialization links the training-time exponent to a task-weighted spectral measure defined independently of the loss fit. The paper proposes a preregistrable factorial test using matched-budget geometry, multiscale exponent ordering, and a predicted reversal across contrasting tasks. For transparency, reproducibility materials, analysis scripts, and supporting results are publicly available here: The current manuscript is available privately upon request. If you are eligible to endorse submissions to cs.LG and consider this paper appropriate for the category, I would be very grateful for your help. This is only a request to confirm subject-area suitability, not a request for peer review or agreement with the paper’s conclusions. Endorsement link: Endorsement code: ZAWO79 The fourth character is the capital letter O , not zero. ORCID: I’m happy to answer any questions about the paper. Thank you very much for your time. Jie Wang School of Civil and Commercial Law Southwest University of Political Science and Law