# [arXiv cs.LG Endorsement Request] Why Can Systems Trained on the Same Data Scale Differently? > Source: > Published: 2026-08-31 10:51:42+00:00 Hi everyone, I’m preparing my first arXiv submission in **cs.LG** and am seeking an endorsement. **Paper:** *Coupled Scaling: A Representational Accessibility Framework for Neural Scaling Laws* The paper asks why systems trained on the same data can exhibit different scaling behavior when architecture or optimization changes the task-relevant representations they can efficiently reach. It introduces **Coupled Scaling**, a task-conditioned framework connecting finite-budget neural scaling to representational accessibility. **Main results:** In a solvable mode-truncation model, loss separates exactly into target energy outside architectural support and an unresolved supported tail. For arbitrary acquisition orders, the residual exponent lies in ργ≤α≤γ. Under bounded off-prefix gain, the lower endpoint is exact: α=ργ. A fixed-kernel specialization links the training-time exponent to a task-weighted spectral measure defined independently of the loss fit. The paper proposes a preregistrable factorial test using matched-budget geometry, multiscale exponent ordering, and a predicted reversal across contrasting tasks. For transparency, reproducibility materials, analysis scripts, and supporting results are publicly available here: The current manuscript is available privately upon request. If you are eligible to endorse submissions to cs.LG and consider this paper appropriate for the category, I would be very grateful for your help. This is only a request to confirm subject-area suitability, not a request for peer review or agreement with the paper’s conclusions. **Endorsement link:** **Endorsement code:** `ZAWO79` (The fourth character is the capital letter **O**, not zero.) **ORCID:** I’m happy to answer any questions about the paper. Thank you very much for your time. Jie Wang School of Civil and Commercial Law Southwest University of Political Science and Law