# Are LLMs Safe Beyond Text: Do Emojis Expose Gaps in Safety Evaluation

> Source: <https://www.machinebrief.com/news/are-llms-safe-beyond-text-do-emojis-expose-gaps-in-safety-ev-tv88>
> Published: 2026-08-20 04:00:00+00:00

arXiv:2608.18164v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Safety evaluations of large language models (LLMs) predominantly rely on text-based adversarial prompts, potentially overlooking vulnerabilities arising from alternative input representations. This work examines emoji-augmented prompts as a test case for this gap, evaluating 50 prompts across four open-source LLMs (Mistral 7B, Qwen 2 7B, Gemma 2 9B, Llama 3 8B). Results show substantial variation in robustness: Gemma 2 9B and Mistral 7B exhibit non-zero success rates (10%), Llama 3 8B 6%, while Qwen 2 7B shows complete resistance (0% success rate). A chi-square test ($\chi^2 = 32.94, p < 0.001$) confirms significant differences in outcome distributions. These findings indicate that robustness is sensitive to input representation, and that evaluations restricted to standard text prompts may underrepresent model vulnerabilities.
