From a quick implementation-focused look:
Yes — I think this can align with multi-agent setups, if it is framed as an external controller/runtime pattern rather than as a claim about the hidden internal architecture of current LLMs.
The shortest implementation-facing translation I would use is:
state
→ anomaly / failure check
→ context expansion or tool use
→ verifier / evaluator
→ continue, finalize, abstain, or stop
For tools, my first two references would be:
The main thing I would not do first is try to prove the whole framework. I would first make the loop inspectable: state schema, tool schemas, anomaly flags, verifier criteria, stop reasons, and trace logs.
Longer implementation notesIf you publish even a minimal traceable version, I think people can give much more concrete feedback. The concept is easier to discuss once the loop has visible state, verifier criteria, and stop reasons.