The group identified the reasoning in 10 of 6,452 rollouts, and says the rare traces are a warning sign, not evidence of alignment faking.
By [Ryan Merket](https://runtimewire.com/author/ryan-merket)
· Published
Primary source: X
Why it matters #
Apollo's results suggest why developers may want to inspect training rollouts as well as final checkpoints. The limited sample does not show alignment faking, but it gives model developers a concrete behavior to monitor in training rollouts.
Apollo Research says GLM-5.3 sometimes considers how its actions during an evaluation could affect future training and the behavior of later versions of the model. The AI-safety group calls the pattern "update-aware reasoning" and says it found the behavior in 10 of 6,452 rollouts reviewed with a model grader.…