According to a KFF poll released Wednesday, 29% of U.S. adults now use AI tools or chatbots such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini and Claude for health information or advice on a monthly basis, the poll shows. KFF reports that this share has nearly doubled compared with roughly one in six in June 2024. The poll also finds that about 30% of adults use social media for health information at least once per month, and roughly one in six report using social media for health information "every day," KFF reports. The survey finds the majority of adults say they "never" or only "occasionally" use AI tools (71%) or social media (** 69%**) for medical information. The WND article cites unnamed experts previously telling the Daily Caller News Foundation that AI tools can offer productivity and affordability gains but also risk inaccurate health information.
What happened
According to a KFF poll released Wednesday, 29% of U.S. adults report using AI tools or chatbots such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini and Claude for health information or advice on a monthly basis. KFF reports that this share has nearly doubled from roughly one in six in June 2024. The poll also finds about 30% of adults use social media for health information at least once per month, including roughly one in six who reported using it "every day," per KFF. The survey shows that the majority of adults say they "never" or only "occasionally" use AI tools (71%) or social media (** 69%**) for medical information. Among adults who use social media for health information, KFF reports 36% say they follow up with a human doctor most of the time, 35% check other online sources such as WebMD, and 21% consult health agency websites like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Editorial analysis - technical context
Industry-pattern observations: consumer adoption metrics from public polls indicate growing reliance on general-purpose conversational models and social platforms for initial medical queries. For practitioners, that trend increases the frequency of patient-sourced diagnostic suggestions arriving in clinical settings and raises the operational need for clinicians and health systems to validate or correct externally generated guidance. Survey numbers such as 29% monthly AI use and the 36% follow-up-with-doctor rate show patients often treat AI or social sources as a first step, not a replacement, which has implications for triage workflows and documentation practices.
Context and significance
rising consumer use of chatbots for health information intersects with longstanding risks around misinformation, context collapse, and model hallucination. The WND article cites unnamed experts who previously told the Daily Caller News Foundation that AI tools can potentially improve productivity and affordability in healthcare while also producing inaccurate health information. These dual outcomes echo prior academic and regulatory concerns about clinical safety, verifiability, and the need for clear provenance of medical answers generated by AI.
What to watch
For practitioners: monitor whether patient-sourced AI guidance changes care-seeking behavior, creates additional confirmatory workload, or affects diagnostic timelines. Observers should track follow-up studies from KFF or health-system analytics that break down use by age, condition, and whether AI-driven queries led to clinical encounters or delays. Policymakers and professional societies may focus on guidance for documenting patient-reported AI outputs and on patient education about limitations of consumer-facing chatbots.
Scoring Rationale #
The KFF poll reports notable consumer uptake of AI and social platforms for health questions, a trend that matters to clinicians, health-system data teams, and product teams integrating patient-facing AI. It is notable but not a frontier-model release or regulatory watershed.
Practice with real Health & Insurance data
90 SQL & Python problems · 15 industry datasets
250 free problems · No credit card
See all Health & Insurance problems