Some of the most prominent voices in AI have strong ideas about the way the tech should be governed.
At the G7 Summit in Évian-les-Bains, France, on Wednesday, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and Google DeepMind founder Demis Hassabis called for a US-led coalition to shape standards for AI, according to CNBC and The Financial Times.
The tech leaders proposed that this coalition be an international effort with the US leading the conversations around AI's risks. They warned of the tech's dangers, including major bioterrorism and cybersecurity risks, if an alliance couldn't be formed to preempt them.
- The proposal was supported by OpenAI's Sam Altman and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, according to media reports.
- According to the FT, Amodei told G7 leaders they must “resist the temptation to splinter” over the deployment of advanced AI tools.
The proposal comes days after Anthropic's latest messy dispute with the Trump Administration over the release of its latest models, Mythos 5 and Fable 5. The US government imposed export controls on the models, restricting their use outside the country and by foreign nationals, citing cybersecurity and national security concerns.
As a result, other government leaders have expressed their concerns: According to the FT, French President Emmanuel Macron said that if the US can "turn off the switch" on powerful models, the impacts could ricochet back on the AI companies leading the market. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi also expressed his concern, reportedly saying that democratic nations must have access to leading AI models to safeguard infrastructure.
Macron also warned against the risks of “non-cooperation among democracies" as it relates to AI regulation, calling for stronger regulation to "jointly define common standards."
Our Deeper View #
If major model providers are to be believed, AI will be a fundamentally transformative technology for society. I've written that the power of this technology has concentrated in the hands of an elite few companies, which has created risks regarding who exerts influence over this societal transformation. It's something that the leaders of these companies themselves have even started to recognize, with Altman, Amodei and OpenAI's Greg Brockman all pointing towards the risks of power centralization. Still, despite these leaders calling for international cooperation to temper the risks, the question of how this tech should be regulated is far from settled. If this technology turns out to be as transformative as these companies claim, it has the potential to have a broad impact on the global community. And that raises questions. Should the regulation of something so broadly transformational be placed in the hands of a small group of government and business leaders, or be voted on more democratically by the people it affects? And with technology changing and evolving so rapidly, how will any kind of regulation keep up?