AgentsView vs fast-resume A developer's comparison of AgentsView v0.41.1 and fast-resume 2.11.2 concludes that fast-resume is preferable due to its simplicity, despite AgentsView offering broader session source support and advanced search features. AgentsView supports 59 session sources and nine agent types, while fast-resume supports 12 sources and 12 agents, with fast-resume's footprint being 14MB versus AgentsView's 116MB app and 28MB data directory. ♠ Previously https://perrotta.dev/2026/05/fast-resume-search-coding-agent-sessions/ . Problem statement : does AgentsView https://www.agentsview.io/ replace fast-resume https://github.com/angristan/fast-resume , or do they solve different problems? I installed both and compared their current releases: % agentsview --version agentsview v0.41.1 commit a902515a, built 2026-08-18T13:34:56Z % fr --version fr 2.11.2 fr has one job: search local agent sessions and resume one in its native agent. Search is typo-tolerant. Enter replaces fr with the original agent process and restores its working directory: Agent stores ──► adapters ──► normalized sessions ──► Tantivy index │ Terminal ◄──── resume handoff ◄──── TUI/search ◄────────┘ AgentsView is a persistent SQLite archive with a desktop app, local web UI, CLI, REST API, MCP server, cost reports, and session health signals. Its search surface is correspondingly larger: % agentsview session search --help | grep -E -- '-- fts|hybrid|regex|semantic|in ' --fts Fast tokenized FTS over messages only --hybrid Hybrid semantic + full-text search reciprocal rank fusion --in string Comma-separated sources: messages,tool input,tool result default all --regex Treat pattern as an RE2 regex --semantic Semantic vector search over user/assistant messages AgentsView documents 59 session sources against fr ’s 12. Resume support is the opposite: AgentsView maps nine agent types, while fr has handoff commands for all twelve, including Pi: fast-resume Pi → pi --session