Agentic AI for operating scientific instruments for nanoscale characterization Researchers at an undisclosed institution presented an agentic-AI framework that operates an atomic force microscope (AFM) using three Model Context Protocol (MCP)-based agents, reducing wrong-command execution to zero in benchmarking and matching expert operators in live experiments. The framework, detailed in arXiv:2608.26198v1, delegates command execution, image-based tuning, and post-processing to AI while keeping experimental intent human-defined. arXiv:2608.26198v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Operating a scientific instrument such as an atomic force microscope AFM requires continuous expert decision-making. A trained user defines the experimental intent, translates it into instrument commands, assesses incoming data, adjusts imaging parameters, and post-processes the final image. Existing automation usually addresses only parts of this workflow through hard-coded routines, task-specific controllers, or trained machine-learning models. Here we present an agentic-AI framework that operates the executable part of the AFM workflow using a general-purpose, tool-augmented large language model connected to instrument functions through the Model Context Protocol MCP . The framework consists of 3 MCP-based agents: AFM Messenger converts natural-language instructions into checked instrument commands; AFM Pilot assesses image quality through a large language model LLM and, if necessary, adapts imaging parameters; and AFM Doctor diagnoses image artifacts and applies transparent post-processing from a pre-approved tool set. Because the language model performs image assessment rather than a fixed scalar objective or external optimizer, the same strategy can be applied across sample types and imaging modes without specific retraining. Safe hardware operation is enforced through an ambiguity check layer before execution. Benchmarking against fine-tuned and off-the-shelf tool-using models shows that this guarded execution layer, rather than model capability alone, reduces wrong-command execution to zero. In live experiments on different samples, AFM Pilot matched expert operators in image quality, iteration count, and tuning time, with no significant difference. These results demonstrate a safe route to agentic operation of scientific instruments, where experimental intent remains human-defined while command execution, image-based tuning, and post-processing are delegated to AI agents.