Earlier this week, we learned A24 entered a research partnership with Google’s DeepMind unit. The reactions were… *not happy, *to say the least. And like many who’ve let generative AI into their hearts, the film studio’s now left playing defense for its widely panned decision.
In a statement to Wired, A24’s communications rep Sophia Shin stressed the “research” part of its Google partnership. “We’re working side-by-side with DeepMind’s researchers to learn, iterate, and build, having an active hand in shaping new tools and workflows,” she explained. “This is about learning and helping pain points in workflows behind the scenes. […] It exists because we want to dictate what tools get built for artists, so they have a voice in shaping them rather than having tools handed to them.
While acknowledging A24 doesn’t love “any of the current AI outputs onscreen in Hollywood,” Shin considers this partnership a bit of a necessary evil. “We’d rather have a seat at the table than on the sidelines,” she stated. The promise of further artist agency and “a seat at the table” are common shields from genAI users, but it doesn’t seem to be working here. Fans consider this move ironic and a betrayal, given *Backrooms *director Kane Parsons recently called the tech “cultural and economic rot” and wished he could just snap it out of existence. Before that, the studio didn’t seem to have much interest in generative AI. In 2024, it came under fire for using the tech to create posters for *Civil War, *while months later, its horror film Heretic had a disclaimer promising it wasn’t made with the technology. But Hollywood’s become
gradually more acceptingof generative AI and its supposed potential for the filmmaking process. In that sense, maybe it was inevitable for A24 to fall in line.
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest
[Marvel],[Star Wars], and[Star Trek]releases, what’s next for the[DC Universe on film and TV], and everything you need to know about the future of[Doctor Who].