cd /news/ai-policy/a-wuhan-court-just-made-ai-productio… · home › topics › ai-policy › article
[ARTICLE · art-140924] src=the-decoder.com ↗ pub= topic=ai-policy verified=true sentiment=· neutral

A Wuhan court just made AI production costs a legal factor in copyright infringement cases

A Wuhan court included AI token usage and AI tool licensing fees in a copyright damages calculation for the first time, awarding 20,000 RMB (about $2,900) to a company whose AI-generated one-hour short drama was copied and re-titled by another firm, the National Law Review reported. The court classified the drama as a protectable audiovisual work because employees made creative decisions at every stage — script, prompt design, selection of AI outputs and final editing — and also weighed runtime, distribution reach and infringement duration. The court recommended creators keep records such as scripts, prompt drafts and project files.

by read1 min views1 publishedSep 28, 2026
A Wuhan court just made AI production costs a legal factor in copyright infringement cases
Image: The Decoder

Token usage and AI tool licensing fees have been included in a copyright damages calculation for the first time. A court in Wuhan, China made the ruling in a dispute over an AI-generated short drama, the National Law Review reports.

The decision extends China's growing copyright protections for AI-created works. Back in 2023, a Beijing court already granted copyright protection to an AI-generated image. In this case, a company used AI tools in early 2026 to produce a one-hour short drama and published it on platforms like WeChat. One day later, another company copied the work, gave it a new title, and ran ads in it.

The court classified the drama as a protectable audiovisual work because employees had made their own creative decisions at every stage, from the script to prompt design, selection of AI outputs, and final editing. The AI was just a tool. Beyond AI-specific costs, the court also weighed traditional factors like runtime, distribution reach, and how long the infringement lasted.

It awarded the plaintiff 20,000 RMB (about $2,900) and recommended that creators keep records such as scripts, prompt drafts, and project files.

AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans

					Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.				

					Subscribe now

National Law Review

── more in #ai-policy 4 stories · sorted by recency
── more on @wuhan court 3 stories trending now
sponsored brought to you by zahid.host 4,200+ EU-deployed projects
reading about agents? ship yours in a single git push.

Run your AI side-project on zahid.host

EU-based hosting, git-push deploys, automatic HTTPS, no cold starts. Free tier with a custom domain — perfect for shipping the agent you just read about.

$git push zahid main
→ Live at https://your-agent.zahid.host ✓
Get free account → Pricing
from €0/mo · no card required
LIVE [news/a-wuhan-court-just-m…] indexed:0 read:1min 2026-09-28 · —