# A Transformative AI Strategy for Europe

> Source: <https://transformative-ai.eu/>
> Published: 2026-09-20 17:27:09+00:00

**Without urgent and far-reaching action beginning this year, the prosperity, sovereignty, and security of all Europeans are at risk as AI advances at a rapid pace.**

The next months and years of AI progress have the potential for both great opportunity and grave danger. Europe, on its current trajectory, is fully exposed to the latter but only to a small share of the former. Like the rest of the world, Europe faces threats such as AI-enabled cyber or biological attacks or loss of control over AI systems. But even if the world manages to mitigate these threats and AI delivers predominantly positive outcomes, the wealth and strategic leverage that powerful AI generates will, by default, concentrate outside of Europe.

Neither of these outcomes needs to be Europe’s destiny. But the window for action is closing further every month. Unless Europe wakes up, it risks having no meaningful control over how the most consequential technology ever built will affect its citizens.

**This strategy sets out a plan for how Europe can change course.** [Part A](./part-a) describes strategic priorities and lists recommendations for how to achieve them. [Part B](./part-b) contains implementation details for those recommendations.

# Contributors

### Senior Expert Council

### Research Leads

### Special Advisors

### Contributing Experts

Rebecca

Arcesati

MERICS

Thorsten

Benner

Global Public Policy Institute (GPPi)

Tao

Burga

Institute for Progress

Jasmine

Dhaliwal

METR

Jonas

Freund

GovAI

Pieter

Garicano

Works in Progress

Emily

Gillett

Institute for Law & AI

Jitse

Goutbeek

The School for Moral Ambition

Ryan

Greenblatt

Redwood Research

Jakub

Growiec

SGH Warsaw School of Economics

Philipp

Hacker

European University Viadrina

Fredrik

Heintz

Linköping University

Marius

Hobbhahn

Apollo Research

Daan

Juijn

Arq Foundation

Antoine

Levie

KU Leuven

Nick

Moës

The Future Society

Robert

Praas

Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS)

Jelle

Prins*

Cradle.bio

Roxana

Radu

University of Oxford

Georg

Riekeles

European Policy Centre

Jacob

Schaal

AI Objectives Institute

Tillman

Schenk

Bruegel

Jaime

Sevilla

Epoch AI

Afek

Shamir

RAND Europe

Haroon

Sheikh

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Ole

Teutloff

University of Oxford

Chloé

Touzet

SaferAI

Hans

Uszkoreit

German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)

Risto

Uuk

Future of Life Institute

Mathilde

Velliet

French Institute of International Relations (Ifri)

Philipp

von der Wippel

ProjectTogether

Max

Welling

University of Amsterdam

Julia

Willemyns

Centre for British Progress

### Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following individuals for providing input to this strategy at workshops, in conversations, and in written form:

Markus Anderljung, Benjamin Balde, Johannes Ballentin, Hannes Bastians, Rishi Bommasani, Siméon Campos, Judith Dada, Jimmy Farrell, Zlatko Grigorov, Erich Grunewald, Lennart Heim, Jakob Hensing, Will Hodgkins, Jason Hoelscher-Obermaier, Peter Ide-Kostic, Florian Klumpp, Sebastian Lobentanzer, Sam Manning, Nicolas Miailhe, Richard Moulange, Maximilian Negele, Nuria Oliver, Bálint Pataki, Dylan Rogers, Anneke Schwedler, Fabrizio Silvestri, Stan van Baarsen. We are especially grateful to Stephen Clare for extensive contributions to the drafting and editing of the strategy.We also thank numerous European government officials and political leaders who have engaged with us throughout the drafting process and whose advice has made this document a more useful strategy.

* To preserve the independence of the strategy while benefiting from industry expertise, the role of industry representatives was consultative: Any feedback from them on drafts was optional for other contributors to address. They did not vote on or approve the strategy, and held no veto rights. The non-Industry members of the Senior Expert Council and Research Leads led on all content questions, with the Editorial Lead being ultimately responsible for resolving any disagreements.
