In the AI era, AI security is data security.
Security teams need an automated data security platform (DSP) that finds sensitive data, reduces risk, and stops threats in real time.
In 2026, the biggest AI security challenges all point to one reality: AI security is data security. AI models need broad access to enterprise data to deliver value, which opens the floodgates and increases risk. But the goal shouldn’t be to slow AI adoption. Rather, it should be to enable it safely.
Yaki Faitelson, Varonis CEO and Co-Founder, and Ron Bennatan, Varonis VP of Strategy and founder of AllTrue.ai, Guardium, and JSonar, recently sat down to discuss the evolving threat AI poses and why protecting data has become even more crucial as this technology continues accelerating. Here are five takeaways from their conversation and what they mean for security teams navigating AI adoption.
Enterprise AI requires access to data to deliver maximum value. But that access creates new risks. It’s a real conundrum: as Yaki puts it, companies that delay AI, or adopt it without proper controls, risk serious consequences. Companies can’t afford to sacrifice speed, but they also can’t afford to sacrifice security.
Why it matters: Safely enabling AI means organizations need real-time visibility into sensitive data and who — or what — can access it. Without automated data discovery, classification, and access control, AI adoption escalates risk faster than security teams can manage.
Applications once served as an established control layer. They could enforce permissions, add friction, and limit direct access to data. Now, AI agents operate on behalf of users, accessing systems directly, often bypassing traditional app interfaces altogether.
Why it matters: Organizations need a data-centric approach that monitors identities, permissions, and activity across all data systems. When attackers log in using compromised identities, only data-level visibility can detect and limit the damage.
Software is deterministic: During development and testing, a software engineer could define expected outputs and validate an app’s performance. With AI, that’s no longer the case. It’s not possible to fully validate behavior before deployment, just as it won’t be possible to anticipate every failure scenario.
Why it matters: Because AI behavior can’t be fully predicted, security teams need continuous monitoring and automated detection and response to catch abnormal activity in real time, rather than static policies that quickly become outdated.
Human error was once the primary concern. Now, organizations must contend with thousands of autonomous agents, each with access to large volumes of data, which expands the blast radius .
Why it matters: As AI expands the blast radius, a single compromised identity can expose massive amounts of data. Organizations can reduce their risk by automatically removing excessive access and right-sizing permissions.
Policies and governance provide a necessary foundation, but without automation, they create busy work rather than security. Organizations need an automated data security platform (DSP) that enforces policies, monitors agent behavior, and provides AI detection and response (AIDR) that moves as quickly as AI.
Why it matters: Policies without automation fall short of delivering real security outcomes. Only an automated data security platform can keep policies enforced as data changes, detecting and stopping threats at the speed AI operates.
Watch the full conversation: